Korea National Police Agency going all out to prevent foreign suspects from falling victim to racist Korean police

This is an interesting story translated over at Korea Beat:

From now on, detectives investigating crimes by foreigners will be re-assigned whenever they make racially discriminatory remarks.

The National Police Agency (경찰청) announced on the 7th that, in order to protect the rights of foreigners suspected of crimes and to expand the reliability and impartiality of the detectives who investigate those crimes, those detectives will be subject to a system of removal.

According to the Agency, investigators who use racially discriminatory language, fail to notify the consulates of foreign criminal suspects, compel suspects to make statements through force or lack of sleep, or fail to read them their Miranda rights, will be re-assigned at the request of the suspects in order to prevent improper investigative techniques.

Unlike when Korean suspects file such a request, where an investigative means committee is formed and makes a decision on the detectives being re-assigned, for foreign affairs detectives there will be automatic re-assignment without a committee or reason given.

Wow. That's great that the National Police Agency is so keen to prevent foreign suspects from falling victim to racist cops, but automatic re-assignment seems to have some potential for abuse itself. It would seem that a savvy suspect could simply keep making accusations of racially discriminatory language in order to impede an investigation.

Perhaps rules will be in place to guard against such action (e.g., verifying what is said by means of videotaping of interrogations). I hope this also doesn't become merely new rules that are not enforced. Still, I think there are enough organizations, from Catholic charities helping foreign migrant workers from poor countries to groups like ATEK, that would easily create such an international stink if such rules were violated against an innocent person, that they could keep the police reasonably in check. One would hope, anyway.

...

To beat or not to beat

Korea Beat is one of my favorite blogs for the simple reason that the blog owner and some of his hench(wo)men take a good cross section of typical or prominent news items from the Korean-language press and translate them into English. It can provide a decidedly different view from many English-language blogs, which focus so strongly on English-language articles about expat-related issues (like English teachers, etc.), that they contribute to cognitive distortion about how much the Korean media actually focuses on native-speaking English teachers in Korea and their problems (or triumphs). The only downside to his blog is that he facilitates my laziness about reading Korean-language news items directly, but that's my problem.

above: Corporal punishment from long ago. 
I did a Google image search of 체벌 (corporal punishment), but a lot of the things I found were highly inappropriate for a family blog. [source]

Today he has the English translation of an interesting Korean-language article on the prospect that kids are more likely to receive physical punishment in hagwons (of which there are a whopping fifteen thousand in Seoul) than in public schools. An excerpt:

After the Seoul Office of Education announced its decision to eliminate corporal punishment, discussion has also focused on the use of corporal punishment in the hagwons of Seoul. Unlike public schools, which practice whole-person education, hagwons use corporal punishment solely to produce higher test scores, so parents tend to tolerate a certain level of it. That makes it all the more difficult to eliminate corporal punishment from hagwons.

Park Bu-hui, head of consultation with the parents' organization 참교육을 위한 전국학부모회, said, "there are an increasing number of complaints over corporal punishment in hagwons... corporal punishment in hagwons is much more serious since it has no relationship to punishment." However, "there are parents who don't believe corporal punishment is escapable if a good environment for schoolworks is to be created.... some hagwons are popular because they are rumored to have very severe corporal punishment."

I'm going to deliberately leave aside the prospect of whether one wants their child hit or beaten into a good student (I imagine some of these teachers see themselves as forging metal into a sword or useful implement of some kind), which I suspect will be discussed in the comments section at Korea Beat. I have reservations about using corporal punishment (체벌, ch'ebŏl), but I also have reservations about removing it from the school's toolbox as well.

Instead, I want to point out that this article represents some of the common things that annoy me about Korean media articles (and there are a lot of things that annoy me about Korean media). The first and most prominent one being the headline in quotes: "학교보다 학원 가선 더 많이 맞아요," which Korea Beat translated as "Korean kids say more beatings at hagwon than at public school."

But did they really say that? Did anybody really say that? A quote should be used to represent something someone actually said. In English, however, many people sloppily use them as "scare quotes" (Metropolitician, for example, did this in response to my comments in a way that made it look like I'd said something I actually hadn't, an odd practice for a self-described watcher of Korean media falsehoods). Meanwhile, many Korean headline writers or newspaper editors use them to sum up what they or the reporter think the main person (or one of the main persons) in the article might be thinking. When they do this with a direct quote from a single person, it really amounts to putting words in people's mouths by people trying to avoid taking ownership of their own speculative observations. Scary quotes, indeed.

above: Okay, I guess this choice of picture is sort of innocuous, but you do have to wonder about the teacher's motivation.  Maybe I'm the one being a pervertedly prurient pyŏnt'ae. [source]

My second common beef is that the headline's conclusion is simply not backed up with any solid data. We see this in some of the Korean- and English-language articles about native-speaking English teachers, but it happens with other issues as well. Indeed there are beatings at hagwons, or at least kids receiving corporal punishment. And it might be happening more than in public schools, but we don't know from anything provided in the article.

It is basically anecdotal evidence to demonstrate the author's point. It might be true, but it might just as easily be true that kids are more likely to receive corporal punishment from public school. It could even be possible that some hagwons are particularly bad, while most mete out little or no corporal punishment. The article doesn't explore it because there are no means with which to explore it. That's lazy, sloppy, and dishonest journalism. (And it's not the realm of just the Korean media, but that's another post for another time.)

Finally, there is the problem of translating 맞다 as beat or beating in English. As I learned it (which could be entirely wrong; I learned Korean from people who thought North Koreans had horns), the word can mean hit (as in one strike or smack, light or hard) or beat (as in repeated hard strikes), but the choice of "beatings" suggests kids are being taken into a room and struck repeatedly, perhaps until injury occurs, but the article doesn't really go into such detail to come to that conclusion.

Don't get me wrong, though: I am glad Korea Beat did this article and my beef is primarily with the bad habits of the Korean media which it exposes. Our man in Indianapolis and his occasional minions do a fine job and I hope they keep it up for a very long time.

UPDATE:
I forgot to mention that this article sounds like it got the seal of approval from the government sector that is trying to take down the hagwons. For years, administrations left, right, and center have seen the hagwons as an enemy. In short, they:

• sow the seeds of class conflict by helping to put admission to a top school out of reach for those who can't afford to attend them, 
• underscore perceptions of inadequacy by formal school system while taking money away from efforts to fix those perceived problems, and
• create a sort of brain drain from formal teaching and other productive work, while also preventing money from going to other important parts of the economy.

By pointing out that hagwons may be as bad or worse than public schools, perhaps they are employing a tu quoque argument that they hope will resonate with the general public.