Saturday, June 25, 2011

Chaba Choose wisely

I have no interest in dolls whatsoever (watch it, WK, 'cuz I will ban you), but this piece on the line of dolls called American Girls popped up in my daily trawl of all things Korean:
The Cult of Molly.

“I always wanted her glasses,” says Kristine Untalan, 23, a student at American University. “I faked poor eyesight. I was drawn to her nerdiness.”

“I always wanted her tap dance outfit,” Jessica Stewart says, wistfully. “I never got it.”

“When you choose Molly, you’re sort of putting a stake in a path,” says Stewart, 24, an art director for an ad agency. “It makes it more steadfast, who you think you are.”

In Korea, there is a custom called “doljabi,” by which parents predict their child’s future based on what object he reached for on his first birthday.

In the 1980s America of young girls — at least for a sizable portion — personalities could be determined by the selection of an 18-inch plastic doll, made by the Pleasant Company and marketed under the optimistic brand name American Girl.

Choose your doll, and show who you will become.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the frontrunner in this year's award for Most Obscure Korea Reference in News Media.

Doll selection as an American version of tolchabi (돌잡이). I like it. Kudos to the WaPo's Monica Hesse for pulling it off.

Daily Kor for Saturday, June 25, 2011

For your edification, Reuters has a Q&A piece on the status of the Korea-US FTA. It's not "news" that ends up as a numbered story below, but it's informative nonetheless.

Most of today's news stories are actually about US Secretary of State Clinton and her meeting with ROK Foreign Minister Kim Sunghwan. South Korea and the US are almost as close as lips and teeth, a stark contrast to the bad old days when we had the likes of Donald Rumsfeld and President Roh Moohyun tearing away at the fabric of the alliance.

Meanwhile, President Lee is meeting with quite a few Korean War veterans to show his and the country's gratitude, this being the sixty-first anniversary of the start of the 6.25 War (Yugio Chŏnjaeng).
  1. Meeting in Washington, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ROK Foreign Minister Kim Sunghwan signal their two countries will not ease pressure no North Korea, saying Pyongyang must show it has changed its ways before resumption of nuclear talks (Reuters, AP via WaPo)
    • Two sides sign cooperation agreement aimed at developing impoverished countries, particularly in Central Africa (Yonhap)
    • Clinton says no hasty decision on food aid for North Korea (Yonhap)
    • Drawing an analogy with Afghanistan, Clinton calls Korea a good "investment" since end of Korean War (Joongang Daily)
  2. Apple files patent infringement suit against Samsung in Seoul court (Reuters, Bloomberg, AP via WaPo, Yonhap, Korea Herald)
  3. Associated Press Television News says North Korea is rushing to build 100K apartments in Pyongyang by centennial of Eternal President Kim Ilsung's birth in 2012 (AP via WaPo)
  4. EU Chamber of Commerce of Korea presses Seoul to remove non-tariff trade barriers (YonhapKorea Times, Joongang Daily)
  5. Finance Minister Bahk Jaewan vows to create business-friendly environment by easing unnecessary regulations (Yonhap)
  6. Financial Services Commission to buy 1.4 trillion won (US$1.29 billion) worth of bad property finance loans to prop up ailing sector (Yonhap)
  7. US President Barack Obama formally nominates Sung Kim, Korea-born career diplomat, as new ambassador to Seoul, replacing Kathleen Stevens (Yonhap)
  8. On anniversary of start of Korean War, ROK President Lee Myungbak salutes hundreds of veterans from Korea, US, and other countries (Yonhap, Korea Herald)
  9. Pyongyang hopes to burnish image with North Korean edition of Candyland™ (Korea Times)

Friday, June 24, 2011

Ending the war on pot

The War on Drugs is a contentious issue for a number of reasons. Some say it isn't working, some believe it does more harm than good, while others say it prevents drug abuse from getting even worse than it already is.

It seems to me that there may actually be a large portion of Americans who might be comfortable with the idea of not ending the War on Drugs, but simply taking marijuana off the battlefield, which is exactly what Democratic House member Barney Frank of Massachusetts and libertianish Republican Ron Paul of Texas were supposed to have proposed today.

From the Los Angeles Times:
Reps. Paul (R-Texas) and Frank (D-Mass.), though technically on opposite sides of the aisle, have often spoken out against the war on drugs and will propose a bill "tomorrow ending the federal war on marijuana and letting states legalize, regulate, tax, and control marijuana without federal interference," according to a statement from the Marijuana Policy Project via Reason.

The bill would allow the individual states to decide how they want to deal with pot. Currently the federal government bogarts U.S. law, oftentimes arresting owners and employees of medical marijuana facilities, for example, who thought they were operating legally under city, county and/or state laws.

"The legislation would limit the federal government’s role in marijuana enforcement to cross-border or inter-state smuggling, allowing people to legally grow, use or sell marijuana in states where it is legal," according to the MPP statement.

The legislation, co-sponsored by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.), and Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Oakland), is the first of its kind to be proposed in Congress that would end the 73-year-old federal marijuana prohibition that began with the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937.
Though the co-sponsors all appear to be Democrats, it would seem that this kind of bill would appeal to a great many Republicans for two reasons. First, it aims to limit government, a mainstay policy among many conservatives, in an area where Democrats often complain about the excesses of the Federal government.

Second, it promotes "states' rights" in lieu of control by the Feds, another a rallying cry of conservatives. But it's a state's-rights issue that's not about limiting the rights and freedoms of minorities, so it might not resonate with the constituency.

Ahem. At any rate, one has to wonder if this will pass. Most Democrats wouldn't think of voting yes on this unless a whole bunch of Republicans did the same to give them cover. And if it did end up on President Obama's desk, would he sign it? As the article notes, at different times he has been in favor of and then opposed to decriminalizing marijuana.

Only you can smoke prevention...
Wait, hold on...
Only you can prevent smoke potting...
Wait, wait, I've got this...
Only you can presmoke fired forests...
[
laughs hysterically]
Line!
But as the bill suggests, this is not about decriminalizing it. It's about leaving that up to the states. As a moderate, I eschew the liberal notion that the Federal government or any government is always the best solution for every problem, as well as the conservative ideology that government is generally the worst solution to any problem. Instead, I believe that it is necessary to carefully pick and choose which issues are best left up to local jurisdictions to handle publicly or privately and which are more effectively dealt with at the Federal level, again through public or private means. While the nature of insurance markets and health care needs favor a national approach, I think that marijuana legislation (but not necessarily enforcement pertaining to harder drugs) is more appropriate at the local level where local values and concerns can be better represented.

We'll have to see how this goes. I wasn't even aware of this until I saw it in the LAT's "In case you missed it" column. I apparently had.

Daily Kor for Thursday, June 24, 2011

My goodness, gas stations running out of gas. That is serious, and it's no wonder that reserves are being released (a move also being done by the Obama administration).
  1. Ruling Grand National Party unweils massive 6.8 trillion won (US$6.3 billion) blueprint for lowering college tuition, with a pledge to cut educational fees 30 percent from current levels by 2014 (Yonhap, Korea Times, Joongang DailyKorea Herald
  2. Samsung to release results of probe into plant safety following leukemia deaths among workers (AP via WaPo)
    • Court order compensation for Samsung employees who died of Leukemia (Yonhap, WSJ)
  3. South Korea to release 3.467 million barrels of oil from its reserves (WSJ, Yonhap)
    • Government asks refiners to maintain price cuts or raise prices slowly (Reuters)
  4. USFK issues statement updating environmental probe, saying so far no trace of Agent Orange has been found at bases (Reuters, WSJ)
    • US military releases results of 2004 environmental study that found minute traces of dioxin, though its connection with Agent Orange cannot be substantiated (Yonhap, Joongang Daily)
  5. Children of foreign residents in South Korea top 150,000 (Yonhap)
  6. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy and Korea International Trade Association call for early implementation of free-trade agreement with US (Yonhap)
    • National Assembly passes bill to protect local industry from cheap exports after Korea-EU FTA takes effect (Yonhap)
  7. Financial Services Commission to pursue tougher sanctions against executives and financial companies for breaches of computer security (Bloomberg, Yonhap)
  8. Unification Ministry suggests arbitration over South Korea-owned assets at North Korea's Kŭmgangsan resort be brought to international court (Korea Times)
  9. Despite 1-1 draw with Jordan, Korea Republic (that's South Korea, folks) advances to third and final round of regional Olympic soccer qualification (Yonhap)
  10. Despite threat of flooding, Minot, North Dakota, goes ahead with annual tennis tournament (ESPN)

Costly military action gives Republicans the vapors

From the Los Angeles Times:
House Republicans charged forward Wednesday with a plan to try to scale back U.S. military engagement in Libya, a move intended as a rebuke of President Obama's handling of the mission.

GOP members agreed in a private meeting to hold a vote on a bill that would cut off funding for "hostilities" in Libya, while continuing to support noncombat activities by the NATO-led operation, including intelligence-gathering and support.

The measure, which is not expected to pass the Senate, could come up for a House vote as early as Friday.

The focus on hostilities is a pointed rebuff of Obama, who has chosen not to seek congressional authorization for the mission under the War Powers Act. The White House has argued that the U.S. involvement does not meet the legal definition of hostilities, as described in the act.

Both Democrats and Republicans have expressed frustration with the president's decision, saying it sets a dangerous precedent for expanding executive power and undermining Congress. That frustration is most concentrated, however, in the Republican-led House, where skepticism of the president is intense and concern over the financial effects of international interventions is a hot topic.

House Republicans were quick to voice frustration Wednesday. Some complained that the U.S. had no clear mission or endgame in the conflict, and worried that it could escalate quickly. Others cited monetary concerns: More than $700 million has been spent so far to support the mission.
Really, while I get the concern that the situation in Libya may necessitate Congressional approval, weren't some of these Republicans the same ones who were questioning the patriotism of various Democrats when the latter opined negatively about how Bush's people were executing the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or the need for going into Iraq in the first place?

And whisky tango foxtrot, when did the Republicans — who until 2009 were utterly unfazed by the financial disaster that was is the Iraq War — get so upset over a mere $700 million? (Come to think of it, SCHIP funding to give medical insurance to kids was too expensive when it would have been a tiny sliver of the Iraq War budget, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.)

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Rick Perry...



Is it just me, or does current Texas Governor Rick Perry seem like he's doing an imitation of Josh Brolin doing an imitation of George W. Bush in the movie W.?


Daily Kor for Thursday, June 23, 2011

Would you want to live on one of the Five Islands of the West Sea (서해오도)? You know, the ones that North Korea occasionally attacks because they no longer think the Northern Limit Line (or NLL, the de facto maritime border since the end of the Korean War). How about visiting? Now before you say Hell, no!, please consider that the above picture was taken on the lovely island of Paengnyŏngdo (백령도). It's Tumujin (두무진).

Now before you say Hell, yes!, please consider that the picture at right was also taken off the waters of Paengnyŏngdo. That's a great white. Great whites are a rare sight in Korea, usually seen only in English classrooms. [rim shot]
  1. South Korean government announces new processing center for incoming North Korean refugees (Monster Island, AFP, BBC, Yonhap)
  2. South Korea to invest 910.9 billion won (US$848 million) to develop Sŏhae-odo, the "Five Islands of the West Sea" located in the Yellow Sea near North Korean shores, to include improved housing and medical services as well as tourism (Bloomberg, Yonhap)
  3. MSCI index keeps South Korea and Taiwan at "emerging market" status, says two Asian tigers will be able to join ranks of developed markets in benchmark index only after making currencies fully convertible (Reuters, FTJoongang Daily, Bloomberg)
  4. Speaking in Seoul, actor and activist Richard Gere criticizes China for what he describes as widespread abuse of Tibetans (AP via WaPo)
  5. President Lee Myungbak congratulates UN Secretary-General Ban Kimoon on election to second term (Yonhap)
  6. Hyundai Heavy Industries says ship orders will be nearly double this year from a weak 2010 (WSJ)
  7. Samsung loses bid in court to examine Apple's future products in defense of patent-infringement lawsuit (Bloomberg)
  8. South Korean and US academics create digitized archive of Korean War (Yonhap)
  9. New AmCham chief is "optimistic" about ratification of Korea-US free-trade agreement (Yonhap)
    • President Lee calls on National Assembly committee to ratify FTA (Yonhap)
  10. South Korea gets international approval to build second research facility in Antarctica (Yonhap, Korea Herald)
  11. Ministry of Education admits Korea English Job Fair in Vancouver was disorganized failure (Korea Times)

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Kiro... hope that's not shorthand for ki•ller ro•bot

Engadget, which is where I get most of my iPhone news, has an article on Kiro, the Robot who can do anything, including your job, whatever it is:
Developed by Korea's Robot Research Institute, the bot recently wrapped up a three week trial period in a kindergarten classroom, where he apparently spent most of his time screening educational videos on his abdomen, playing interactive games, and keeping his students in rapt attention. When he wasn't busy dishing out Ritalin to his underlings, Kiro also served as a guide at the Dong-A University Museum, in Busan. After programming the droid with enough knowledge to make him sound smart, engineers set him loose within the art gallery, where he would provide visitors with background information in hushed, docent-dulcet tones. He loves kids. He loves art. He's always smiling. He's the kinda bot you could bring home to Dad.
I don't know... I've been to the future and I've seen what really happens when robots rule the classroom.

By the way, this is not Engadget's first article on Kiro.

The problem with Hanawon is that there is only hana...

The plight of North Korean refugees is near and dear to my heart, and I am keenly interested in issues related to their resettlement in South Korea and other countries. In fact, I can get pretty impassioned about it, especially when hypocrites from countries that are doing — literally — little or nothing complain that South Korea (which has resettled tens of thousands) does too little (see here, here, here, and here).

What many people are unaware of is that one of the major bottlenecks is Hanawon, the government-run facility that orients the new arrivals, screens them to make sure there are no spies among them, and trains them for life in capitalist South Korea. This institution was set up by Kim Daejung and then expanded by his successor Roh Moohyun, two presidents often derided by the aforementioned hypocrites for cozying up to North Korea (when in fact each took in more refugees than all their predecessors combined).

If one is worried about spies in particular, it would be imprudent to speed up the process at Hanawon, as many have suggested they do so that more defectors could be processed. So it is very notable news that the government plans to build a new facility to help with the process.

From AFP:
South Korea announced Wednesday it would build a new resettlement centre to help a growing stream of refugees from communist North Korea assimilate in the capitalist South.

Seoul, which currently operates a mandatory three-month resettlement course at the Hanawon centre, will build the second facility by the end of 2012, said the unification ministry in charge of cross-border affairs.

"The number of North Korean defectors keeps rising... the current Hanawon facility is on the verge of being overcrowded," spokeswoman Lee Jong-Joo told reporters.

"We felt we wouldn't be able to provide systematic support for resettlement with only the current Hanawon," she said, adding more than 2,000 North Koreans have fled to the South every year since 2006.

Work on the new centre, in the town of Hwacheon, around 120 kilometres (75 miles) northeast of Seoul, will begin in July. It will accommodate about 500 people at a time.

More than 21,700 North Koreans have fled their impoverished and hunger-stricken homeland since the 1950-53 war, the vast majority in recent years.
In addition to the prospect of allowing more North Koreans to resettle in the South, I think this move has the potential for the flow of DPRK citizens through China to change the political situation. This could be good or bad, depending on how China reacts. On the one hand, they may hold fast to their agreements with long-time ally North Korea and crack down even harder.

On the other hand, they might decide it's best to just, ahem, go with that flow and let it turn into a torrent of sorts. This has the potential to eventually create a situation in which the structures holding North Koreans in place simply collapses. And that could precipitate a situation, à la East Germany in 1989, in which the Pyongyang regime itself collapses. (This is the goal of the infamous Dr Norbert Vollertsen.)

Back to Hanawon. In case you're wondering what exactly happens there, the AFP goes into some detail:
South Korea sends each new arrival on a three-month assimilation and training course at Hanawon, in the city of Anseong, south of Seoul, and provides financial and housing support afterwards.

The course covers career guidance, information on the South and basic everyday skills such as buying a subway ticket, opening a bank account and using a credit card.

But many struggle to find decent jobs, partly because their ideological education in the North is irrelevant in the South. Some allege discrimination in the workplace.

Seoul will also offer a more diverse range of training courses for refugees based on their previous jobs in the North such as doctors and teachers, Lee said.

She said the ministry had long focused on helping new arrivals. "But with the number of refugees rising, we thought we need more systematic programmes to help them settle here."
Frankly, I think we could turn the resettlement into more of a win-win situation by encouraging the North Koreans to settle in areas that are suffering from population decline. These rural areas may be a bit more at the North Koreans' speed, and these local areas might actually welcome the influx of new blood to the region. And with all the Vietnamese and Chinese around there who are also trying to make it in the capitalist South, they might enjoy the company.

Hawaii Finder 2011-16


Actually, I'm not sure if the number is right. This is probably an easy one.

Daily Kor for Wednesday, June 22, 2011

From story #6

Well, it's officialy, Ban Kimoon is a two-termer. I think story #3, about President Lee going to South Africa for the vote on hosting the Olympics next month, is the potentially the most notable. It worked for Vladimir Putin in 2007 when he went to the IOC meeting and gave all the Europeans the evil eye; I'm not sure if the Bulldozer can inspire such fear if he doesn't get his way, though, looking as he does, like Marilyn Manson without the make-up.
  1. UN Secretary-General Ban Kimoon formally elected to second term by United Nations General Assembly (AP via MSNBC, Xinhua, AFP, Yonhap)
  2. Korean Air to acquire up to thirty CS300 regional aircraft from Québec-based Bombadier Aerospace (AFP, Bloomberg)
  3. ROK President Lee Myungbak will attend vote on 2018 Winter Olympics hosting to be held in South Africa in July (Reuters)
  4. Following Marine shooting at Asiana Airlines jet near Kyodong-do Island after mistaking it for North Korean military plane, Beijing asks Seoul to ensure air safety of civilian aircraft (Reuters)
  5. Defector's file reports with South Korea's human rights commission over abuses received in North Korean jails (AFP)
  6. Two killed when Russian-made Air Force training jet crashes in North Ch'ungch'ŏng Province (Yonhap, Joongang Daily)
  7. Seoul shares rise 1.4 percent as fears of Greek default subside (Reuters)
  8. Korea-EU trade deal may see Korean Air rise above Cathay Pacific to become world's largest international air cargo company (Bloomberg)
  9. ROK Econ Minister says South Korea will seek ways to encourage LPG as an alternative to natural gas (Reuters)
  10. President Lee says university restructuring should occur before the government gives them financial support to lower tuition (Yonhap)
  11. Woody Allen reportedly spending $100 million to open bio research institute aimed at figuring out how to put White boobs on Asian women (Hollywood Reporter)

Vancouver hero

If you read my site regularly, you know that rioters piss me off (and I'm making the distinction between legitimate protesters and those who seek to cause violence and damage to others' property, especially when the victims have nothing to do with the cause of the riot).

So in the wake of the Vancouver riots following the Stanley Cup (you're supposed to riot when your team wins... idiots), I thought I would post something about one of the heroes of the riots who stood his ground and risked serious bodily injury to stop rioters from torching a car.



His name is Bert Easterbrooka pro-marijuana advocate, and he deserves a lot of credit in my book. One takes some serious risks when they try to the right thing, and the blood on his face at the end of the YouTube video proves it.

This stands in sharp contrast with the likes of, say, Alicia Price, the sweet-looking suburbanite who was one of the people lighting cars on fire.


Or, for that matter, Nathan Kotylak, who was also caught on camera. Seriously, did these people not think there would be loads of people snapping their picture and making these public? I'm not supportive of any vigilantism against these people and especially their families, and I question the wisdom of online "public shaming" (what is the threshold of evidence or, for that matter, what level of "crime" deserves such treatment?), but the rioters should have expected that something like this could happen.


Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Luring Lee and Ling

From the Chosun Ilbo we get news that a recently executed spy chief was the one responsible for luring Current TV reporting team Laura Ling, Euna Lee, and Mitch Koss into North Korea where they were captured, sentenced to a dozen years of hard labor, but later released when former President Bill Clinton flew into Pyongyang for an angry photo op.

From the Chosun Ilbo:
Recently executed North Korean spy chief Ryu Kyong planned and orchestrated the abduction of two female U.S. journalists on March 17, 2009, it emerged on Sunday.

Ryu, who served as the deputy director of North Korea's State Security Department, obtained intelligence that Laura Ling and Euna Lee, journalists working for Current TV, were planning to visit the North Korean border as part of their report on defectors.

He then used his overseas operatives to bribe an ethnic Korean guide in China to lead the two women into the hands of their abductors. The guide took Ling and Lee to a point on the banks of the Duman (or Tumen) River, where they were dragged across the border into North Korea.
If you have read what my contrarian opinions on the then-ongoing Ling and Lee saga (here, here, here, here, and here), you will not be surprised that my response to this is, "Horsesh¡t."

We'll start with the obvious and then go to the glaring: Other than "it emerged Sunday" in the first paragraph, we are left with zero information about who said this. From where or whom did it "emerge"? When it comes to journalism, subject-less passive voice is weasel words.

And then there is the glaring problem that this take simply does not jibe with the facts we know now. Way back, when Laura Ling and Euna Lee were captured and Mitch Koss just barely escaped, everybody (well, except me) was under the impression that they had been plucked from the Chinese side while merely taking video of the North Korean side of the border. But as it turned out, Laura and Euna did in fact venture onto North Korean soil "very, very briefly." It was then that the North Korean soldiers tried to capture them, but Laura Ling said in her book they managed to get across the river and back to the Chinese side before being dragged back into North Korea.

So which is it? The third paragraph above completely omits Ms Ling and Ms Lee voluntary entering North Korean territory. It's almost as if the source from which this report "emerged" is unaware that Ms Ling and Ms Lee confessed to going into North Korean territory of their own accord.

And this is problematic. In fact, if it jibes with anything, it's the pattern of behavior coming from the Chosun Ilbo whereby speculation is being reported as fact.

At most, what might be at work here is that spy chief Mr Ryu might have maneuvered for the trio to be captured, but ultimately they sealed their own fate by venturing into the DPRK (though we know North Korea had kidnapped people from China and brought them into North Korea). Frankly, though, I don't buy it. If you read the early chapters of Laura Ling's book, the people who captured her and Euna Lee seem pretty clueless about who it was they captured. The early hours and days of their ordeal don't sound as if they would have gone down that way if it had been known before their capture who they were and where they would be.

I loathe the Pyongyang regime, but as I made clear before, these three demonstrated gross carelessness and negligence and their foolishness may have cost lives. I don't think it is right to point the finger at phantom others when we already know who was responsible for them being right where they were.

Moreover, I don't like the mainstream South Korean media (and the Japanese and Western media who pick up their reports) giving us a distorted picture of what's going on up in the North by their supposition-filled reporting. From the ascension of Kim Jong-il to the conditions on the ground for the peasantry up there, we are doing everyone a gross disservice by engaging in a journalistic circle jerk of speculation parading as objective news.

UPDATE:
This might not be his intended takeaway message, but Joshua at One Free Korea notes that "the Chosun Ilbo doesn’t offer one scintilla of detail on its source for the story or why we should consider it credible."

At ROK Drop, GI Korea also describes his reservations about the whole thing.