Indeed, the latter loss — and the footage of Pyongchanger children weeping in front of cameras — brought out a parade of people in the K-blogosphere and elsewhere telling us why this icy and mountainous county in Kangwon-do isn't ready for Olympic prime time. My favorite was by Mr James Card, a seasoned Pyongchang skier, who wrote that the lack of opportunities to urinate from the side of the slopes really hurt Pyongchang's chances:
There are no back-country, off-trail zones and the runs are blocked off in a way that it is tough to find a place to take a mid-slope pee in the woods.Mr Card's own bladder-control issues aside, there were also concerns that Kangwon-do sometimes lacked piles and piles of snow. Here's what one Marmot's Holeian wrote:
The mountains are not Olympic caliber and the fact that they rely on largely man-made snow makes it a joke. They can plan to build all the hockey rinks and bobsled runs they want, but a good site requires topography and climate, neither of which can be bought.True, perhaps, but guess what we have in store at Vancouver, which beat out Pyongchang the first time around: some venues are so lacking in snow that it's having to truck it in from other places. From the New York Times:
With seven years to prepare and a budget of about $2 billion, organizers have nearly everything in place for next month’s Winter Olympics in Vancouver.They are assuring us that this is normal, and I believe them. At least Vancouver has some nearby snow to snag; I'm not so sure how Sochi the summer resort (whose train station is pictured at left, behind all those palm strees) will fare in four years.
A dearth of snow, and dim forecasts showing not a flake in the near future and temperatures too warm to manufacture it with machines, have forced Olympic organizers to go to the much-dreaded contingency plan at Cypress Mountain, where six skiing and snowboarding events are scheduled to be held.
The Games will go on, but not without some massive maneuvering. Snow, some man-made and stockpiled during the season, will be brought in from higher elevations by land (snow-moving equipment and dump trucks) and possibly air (a helicopter), according to the Vancouver Organizing Committee.
In some cases straw and wood forms will be used as foundations and topped with snow, further reducing the amount of snow needed. At least one helicopter is already in action, moving straw bales that will give shape to competition courses normally made entirely of snow.
I guess if all else fails, the games could be moved to Hawaii's Big Island. There's plenty of snow there.
And let us not forget the other Winter Olympic event in Canada, held in Calgary. Despite the frigid, bitter winds of February, due to the warm January chinook winds, the in-town outdoor events were held on almost completely man-made snow. The out of town events were held on a mountain chosen, not for its glorious winter conditions, for it doesn't compare in the slightest to the world-class facilities an hour or so to the northwest, nor does it even compare to the facilities a short distance up the same valley, but because of political reasons. And Nakiska was subject to winds that stripped it of much of its snow, necessitating the making of snow in order to have enough snow cover to allow the alpine events to take place. Yet, the Games were a success and a good time was had by all. Except by the standard of Canada earning an Olympic gold medal on its home turf, that is. (It's my home town, so I can speak so frankly about it.)ReplyDelete
So objections to Pyeongchang as a host site based on such considerations is rather silly.
Thanks, Wandering Ken. I did not know that about the Calgary games.ReplyDelete